Stance, a critical discourse marker, reflects the expression of attitudes, feelings, evaluations, or judgments by speakers or writers toward a topic or other participants in a conversation. This study investigates the manifestation of stance in the discourse of four prominent artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots—ChatGPT, Gemini, MetaAI, and Bing Copilot—focusing on three dimensions: interpersonal stance (how chatbots perceive one another), epistemic stance (their relationship to the topic of discussion), and style stance (their communicative style). Through a systematic analysis, it is revealed that these chatbots employ various stance markers, including hedging, self-mention, power dominance, alignment, and face-saving strategies. Notably, the use of face-saving framing by AI models, despite their lack of a genuine “face,” highlights the distinction between authentic interactional intent and the reproduction of linguistic conventions. This suggests that stance in AI discourse is not a product of subjective intent but rather an inherent feature of natural language. However, this study extends the discourse by examining stance as a feature of chatbot-to-chatbot communication rather than human-AI interactions, thereby bridging the gap between human linguistic behaviors and AI tendencies. It is concluded that stance is not an extraneous feature of discourse but an integral and unavoidable aspect of language use, which chatbots inevitably replicate. In other words, if chatbots must use language, then pragmatic features like stance are inevitable. Ultimately, this raises a broader question: Is it even possible for a chatbot to produce language devoid of stance? The implications of this research underscore the intrinsic connection between language use and pragmatic features, suggesting that stance is an inescapable component of any linguistic output, including that of AI systems.