Javascript is required
Search
Volume 11, Issue 3, 2024

Abstract

Full Text|PDF|XML
Strategic values play a pivotal role in the long-term success of logistics enterprises, influencing interactions with customers, employees, and stakeholders, and driving sustainable outcomes. In the context of the global logistics sector, the identification and alignment of strategic values are essential for maintaining competitive advantage and fostering resilience. This study systematically investigates the strategic values of the world’s 50 leading logistics companies, focusing on those most strongly associated with sustainable success. Using a qualitative approach, content analysis was employed to evaluate and interpret the strategic documents of these enterprises, revealing key values that contribute significantly to sustainability. Among the values identified, reliability, customer-centricity, and operational efficiency were found to be most influential in ensuring both operational and strategic sustainability. These values were consistently embedded within corporate practices, shaping decision-making processes, stakeholder engagement, and long-term growth strategies. The findings indicate that the integration of sustainability as a core strategic value is critical for enduring success in an increasingly competitive and environmentally conscious market. The results provide valuable insights for both academics and practitioners, offering a framework for logistics companies to refine their strategic management practices and align their operations with sustainable development goals. By highlighting the strategic values that underpin sustainable growth, this study contributes to the understanding of how logistics enterprises can navigate the complex challenges of the modern business environment.

Abstract

Full Text|PDF|XML

Energy dependency plays a pivotal role in shaping the performance of stock markets, particularly in energy-sensitive indices such as the BIST Industrial Index in Turkey. This study presents a comparative evaluation of traditional statistical models and machine learning (ML) techniques in capturing the complex relationship between energy variables and the BIST Industrial Index. A dataset encompassing energy imports, production levels, and energy prices is utilised to assess the effectiveness of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression, Random Forest (RF), and Gradient Boosting (GB) models. The results reveal that ML models substantially outperform traditional statistical methods in their ability to capture nonlinear, intricate relationships between energy metrics and market behaviour. Among the ML models, RF demonstrates the highest predictive accuracy. Feature importance analysis identifies crude oil production as the most significant variable, underscoring the dominant influence of domestic energy dynamics in shaping the BIST Industrial Index. While ML models offer superior forecasting capabilities, they introduce challenges in terms of model interpretability. In contexts where transparency is crucial, statistical models such as OLS remain more favoured for their simplicity and explainability. The findings highlight the need for a balanced approach in model selection, with hybrid models potentially offering the best of both worlds by combining the strengths of traditional and modern methodologies. The insights derived from this study can inform policymakers and investors, particularly within emerging markets, providing a nuanced understanding of the trade-offs between predictive power and model transparency in forecasting energy-sensitive financial indices.

Abstract

Full Text|PDF|XML

The global iron and steel sector is currently navigating a period marked by significant volatility, driven by rising overcapacity and stagnating demand. In this challenging environment, businesses are increasingly compelled to compete not only within their local markets but also on the international stage, as the global economy becomes ever more interconnected. This necessitates a thorough evaluation of the financial performance of major firms in the iron and steel industry, particularly those listed on the Borsa İstanbul (BIST). Such assessments are critical for informing strategic decision-making within the sector. This study aims to assess the financial performance of prominent iron and steel companies traded on BIST between 2019 and 2023, employing an advanced multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. Specifically, an Improved ENTROPY method is combined with the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to rank the fiscal performance of these enterprises. The findings indicate that EREGL stands out as the highest-performing company in terms of financial metrics over the specified period. The study offers valuable insights into the financial health and operational efficiency of iron and steel firms, providing key information for investors and policymakers in the sector. Additionally, the proposed methodology presents a robust framework for the evaluation of corporate performance in other industries facing similar global challenges.

Abstract

Full Text|PDF|XML

This study investigates risk distribution models in the context of auto insurance in emerging markets, with a focus on the National Insurance Company (SAA), regional directorate of Setif, Algeria. The research applies generalized linear models (GLM) and factor analysis to model the frequency of vehicle accidents and their associated risks. A comprehensive approach is employed, beginning with a discussion of the techniques used for data collection and preliminary descriptive analysis. Following this, a theoretical framework is established for understanding the risk distribution models, highlighting the role of GLM in the modelling of accident frequencies within the insurance industry. Different types of factor analysis, including basic coefficient analysis, cross-factor analysis, generalized cross-factor analysis, and mixed factor analysis, are examined in relation to their applicability to insurance risk modelling. Subsequently, generalized linear models are implemented to derive a robust model for accident frequency, utilizing R software for analysis. The results reveal that the pricing system of the National Insurance Company is influenced by multiple, non-deterministic factors, which complicate the prediction of accident rates and insurance costs. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating various risk factors into pricing strategies, rather than relying on deterministic models. The study highlights the necessity of considering a broader range of factors in the development of pricing systems, particularly in emerging markets where data may be incomplete or subject to considerable variability. Furthermore, the use of Mixed Poisson models is suggested as an effective approach for capturing the non-linear relationship between various risk factors and accident occurrence. This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing a nuanced understanding of the application of GLM and factor analysis in the auto insurance sector, particularly in emerging markets.

Abstract

Full Text|PDF|XML
The occurrence of market anomalies has been steadily increasing in contemporary stock markets, particularly within the context of the current economic climate. The volatility of stock markets, exacerbated by the recent inflation crisis, has heightened the need for anomaly detection and informed investment decisions. This study focuses on the BIST 100 index in Turkey, specifically examining the XU030 spot market and the XU030D1 futures market, where significant economic fluctuations are prevalent. The Three Sigma Rule was applied to establish threshold values for anomaly detection, and a directional impact analysis was conducted based on these thresholds. The findings indicate that a positive anomaly in the spot market leads to an average increase of 7.65% in the futures market, while a negative anomaly in the spot market results in an average decrease of 8.69% in the futures market. Conversely, a positive anomaly in the futures market has an average positive impact of 7.82% on the spot market, while a negative anomaly in the futures market results in an average negative impact of 3.99% on the spot market. These results underscore the interconnected nature of the spot and futures markets, particularly in times of economic volatility, and provide insights into how anomalies in one market can influence the other. The study’s findings have significant implications for investors, highlighting the need for careful monitoring of market anomalies and their potential directional effects on investment strategies.
- no more data -