Javascript is required
Ariyo, A. (2005). Liquidity Management in Nigeria, Lagos, West African book publishers
Bhunia, A. (2010). A trend analysis of liquidity management efficiency in selected private sector industry, Indian steel; International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management, 1(5); 9-21
CBN (2015) Revised Guidelines for compliance with Treasury Single Account by Banks in Nigeria Central Bank of Nigeria (2014), “Communiqué No. 94 of the Monetary Policy Committee Meeting,”
Eme, O. I., Chukwurah, D.C., & Emmanuel, N.I., (2015). An Analysis Of Pros And Cons Treasury Single Account Policy In Nigeria Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (OMAN Chapter) 5(4)
Eljelly, A. (2004). Liquidity-Profitability Tradeoff: An Empirical Investigation in an Emerging Market. International Journal of Commerce & Management. 14(2), pp. 48-61.
Guardian Editorial,(2015). Buhari on Treasury Single Account, Guardian, retrieved on August 28, P16.
Gwarzo. M. (2016)., TSA: Weep Not SEC. Thisdaylive http://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2016/03/09/tsa-weep-not-sec/ retrieved March, 2016
IMF (2010). Treasury Single Account: Concept, Design and Implementation Issues. Working paper prepared by Sailendra Pattanayak and Israel Fainboim, Authorized for distribution by Marco Cangiano and Michel Lazare
Iroegbu,C (2015),”Treasury Single Account ‘ll block leakages’, Vanguard, August 24, P38
Kanu. C. (2016), Impact of Treasury Single Account on the Liquidity .ABC Journal of Advanced Research, 5(1) 43-52.
Lienert(2009). Modernizing Cash Management, Technical Notes and Manuals, Fiscal Affairs Department (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Mathias Okwe, Abuja. Chijioke Nelson, Temiloluwa Adeoye, David Ogah(2015), Treasury Single Account: Giving Life to Jonathan’s ‘Dead’ Policy Directives’, Sunday Guardian, retrieved August 16,Pp52-58
Muhakanizi (2014). Strengthening Public Financial Management and Accountability Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development
Nwankwo, G. (2004). Bank Management Principles and Practice, Lagos. Malt House PressLimited
Obinna, C.(2015), Banks Face Liquidity Strain as FG Fully Enforces Treasury Single Account,
Olagunju, A. Adeyanju, O. & Olabode, O. (2011). Liquidity Management and Commercial Bank’s Profitability in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting. Vol. 2, No. 7/8.
Raheman, A. & Nasir, M. (2007). Working Capital Management and Profitability – Case of Pakistani Firm. International Review of Business Research Papers, 3(1), 279-300
Vanguard Editorial (2015), Treasury Single Account: Bank deposits loss may hit N2trn, August 17,P 18
Search

Acadlore takes over the publication of JAFAS from 2023 Vol. 9, No. 4. The preceding volumes were published under a CC BY license by the previous owner, and displayed here as agreed between Acadlore and the owner.

Open Access
Research article

The Impact of Treasury Single Account on the Liquidity of Banks in Nigeria

opeyemi o. ajetunmobi1,
kehinde adesina1,
samuel o. faboyede2*,
b. peter adejana1
1
College of Business and Social Sciences, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria
2
Department of Accounting, College of Business and Social Sciences, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria
Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies
|
Volume 3, Issue 3, 2017
|
Pages 132-143
Received: N/A,
Revised: N/A,
Accepted: N/A,
Available online: 09-29-2017
View Full Article|Download PDF

Abstract:

The existence of numerous corrupt practices in the Nigerian Public Accounting System has led to the inauguration of Treasury Single Account (TSA). This paper assesses the impact of TSA implementation on the liquidity base of banks in Nigeria. Fifteen (15) listed banks were used as sample size for this study. Data was obtained by the use of annual reports and it was examined using Descriptive statistics and Paired sample t-test. The results obtained confirmed that the implementation of Treasury Single Account impacted negatively on the liquidity base of banks in Nigeria. Also, there is significant difference in the Profit after Tax (PAT) of Banks in Nigeria before and after Treasury Single Account (TSA) Adoption. It was recommended that if the policy is executed it will lead to the prompt payment of all income going into the nation’s purse without the intermediation of multiple banking arrangements.

Keywords: Banking sector liquidity, Economic corruption, Public accounting system, Treasury Single Account
JEL Classification: G28, G21, G31.

1. Introduction

The economic status of any nation depends on how stable their banking industry is. In other words, any issue that affects banks has an impact on the economy of the nation. Until the introduction of Treasury Single Account (TSA) in Nigeria in 2012, Government Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDA) which generate revenue, had multiple accounts in commercial banks, use part of the revenue generated to fund their operations and then remit the surplus to the federation account. As a result, agencies pay into government account what they deem fit and as a result short pay government. The adoption and full application of Treasury Single Account (TSA) by any administration, especially in a dwindling economy cannot be over-emphasized because it encourages transparency and accountability in government parastatals.

Jonah Otunla a former accountant general of the federation before the advent of TSA in Nigeria stated that “There were more than 10,000 bank accounts in multiple banks, which made it impossible to establish government consolidated cash position at any point in time. It led to pockets of idle cash balances held in Ministries, Departments and Agencies accounts (MDA’s) when government was out borrowing money.” (Obinna, 2015:52). A Treasury Single Account is a precondition for efficient fund management and is a productive instrument for the ministry of finance/treasury to establish oversight and centralized control over government’s cash resources. This is due to the fact that a Treasury Single Account is principally to ensure accountability of government revenue, enhance transparency and avoid expropriation of public funds. The Treasury Single Account, which shall be maintained at Nigeria’s apex bank (CBN) will unite the government policy for better cash resources management and ensure the best usage of government funds Boulder (2015).

According to IMF, (2010), TSA is a bank account or a set of linked bank accounts through which the government carries out various business activities, and gets a statement of account of all transactions. This instrument helps the Ministry of Finance a lot as it ensures the proper management of funds available to the nation’s treasury. Oyedele (2015) posited that a vital subject in the past was the delayed payment of income collected on behalf of government as some Ministries Departments and Agencies do business with those funds for their selfish gains at the detriment of infrastructural development and budget execution by the government.

In light of the above, this paper aims to investigate the relationship between adoption of Treasury Single Account and liquidity of banks in Nigeria.

Hypothesis 1

H0: There is no remarkable distinction in the liquidity of Banks in Nigeria before and after Treasury Single Account (TSA) Adoption.

H1: There is a remarkable distinction in the liquidity of Banks in Nigeria before and after Treasury Single Account (TSA) Adoption.

Hypothesis 2

H0: There is no remarkable distinction in the Profit after Tax (PAT) of Banks in Nigeria before and after Treasury Single Account (TSA) Adoption

H1: There is a remarkable distinction in the Profit after Tax (PAT) of Banks in Nigeria before and after Treasury Single Account (TSA) Adoption.

2. Literature Review

A Treasury Single Account (TSA) is a unified structure of government bank accounts that gives a consolidated view of government cash resources. Based on the principle of unity of cash and the unity of treasury, a TSA is a bank account or a set of linked accounts through which the government transacts all its receipts and payments (Lienert, 2009).

2.1
2.1.1 Treasury Single Account (TSA) in Nigeria

The Treasury Single Account (TSA) policy was introduced to block financial leakages, promote transparency and prevent mismanagement of government's revenue, unifies all government accounts, enabling it prevent revenue loss and mismanagement by revenue-generating agencies (Bashir, 2016). Firstly is a unified structure of government bank accounts enabling consolidation and optimal utilization of government cash resources. Through this bank account or set of linked bank accounts, the government transacts all its receipts and payments and gets a consolidated view of its cash position at any given time. The intention of implementing this account was for the benefits of Federation ruled by democracy.

In 2012, it was on record that government ran a pilot scheme for a single account using 217 ministries, department and agencies as a test case. The exercise saved Nigeria about N500 billion in frivolous spending. The success of the pilot motivated the government to implement fully TSA, leading to the directives to banks to provide the technology platform that will help to accommodate the TSA as it facilitates timely and more complete accounting reports (Gwarzo, 2016).

Section 80 (1) of the 1999 Constitution as amended states that "all revenue or other money raised or received by the Federation (not being revenue or other money payable under this Constitution or any Act of the National Assembly into any other public fund of the Federation established for a specific purpose) shall be paid into and form one Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Federation". Successive governments have continued to operate multiple accounts for the collection and spending of revenue, thereby disregarding the provision of the constitution which require the remittance of all the revenue into a single account.

2.1.2 Benefits of Treasury Single Account (TSA)

(Pattanayak, 2010) in a The International Consortium on Governmental Financial Management (ICGFM) seminar elaborated on TSA and its usefulness for any government. According to him TSA aids cash management, and facilitates other functions such as handling payment from all spending units separately, unlike the multiple bank account system. TSA a single account comprising of linked up accounts or can be seen as network of account s operated as one, this account is usually operated by the country's central bank. It is also a unified structure of government bank accounts that gives a consolidated view of government cash resources. The emphasis is placed of the mode of operation as well as the cash control advantage and elimination of idle funds it has.

Table 1. The Benefits of the Treasury Single Account (TSA) include

1

Ensures complete, real-time information on government cash resources

2

Helps preparation of accurate and reliable cash flow forecasts

3

Optimizes the cost of government operations

4

Facilitates efficient payment mechanisms

5

Improves operational and appropriation control during budget execution

6

Enhances efficiency and timeliness of bank reconciliation

Source: ICGFM, 2010
2.1.3 How Treasury Single Account (TSA) Works

The TSA structure can contain ledger sub-accounts in a single banking institution (not necessarily a central bank), and can accommodate external zero-balance accounts (ZBAs) in a number of commercial banks. Second, no other government agency operates bank accounts outside the oversight of the treasury. Options for accessing and operating the TSA are mainly dependent upon institutional structures and payment settlement systems. Third, the consolidation of government cash resources should be comprehensive and encompass all government cash resources, both budgetary and corresponding cash flows are subject to budgetary control or not (Yusuf& Chiejina, 2015). The Central Bank opened a Consolidated Revenue Account to receive all government revenue and effect payments through this account. All Ministries, Departments, and Agencies are expected to remit money collected in to this account through the individual commercial banks who act as collection agents. Although, commercial banks will continue to maintain revenue collection accounts for Ministries, Departments, and Agencies but all monies collected by these banks will have to be remitted to the Consolidated Revenue Accounts with the CBN at the end of each banking day.

2.1.4 Liquidity

The concept of Liquidity has been a source of worry to the management of firms of the uncertainty of the future. Liquidity is a financial term that means the amount of capital that is available for investment. Today, most of this capital is credit, not cash. That's because the large financial institutions that do most investments prefer using borrowed money. Liquidity can be defined as the state or condition of a business organization which determines its ability to honour or discharge its maturing obligations.

Liquidity can be defined as the state or conditions of a business organization which determines its ability to honour or discharge its maturing obligations. These maturing obligations are composed of current liabilities and long term debts. (Olagunju, Adeyanju&Olabode, 2011:28). Liquid assets are composed of cash and bank balances, debtors, balances held with CBN, balances held with other banks in Nigeria, balances held with offices & branches outside Nigeria. Liquidity is the ability of a firm to meet all obligations without endangering its financial conditions. Eljelly (2004) affirmed that the crucial part in managing working capital is required by maintaining its liquidity in day-to-day operation to ensure its smooth running and meets its obligations. Liquidity plays a significant role in the successful functioning of a business firm. A firm should ensure that it does not suffer from lack of or excess liquidity to meet its short term compulsions.

A study of liquidity is of major importance to both the internal and the external analysts because of its close relationship with day-to-day operations of a business. (Bhunia, 2010). Dilemma in liquidity management is to achieve desired trade-off between liquidity and profitability (Raheman& Nasr, 2007). Referring theory of risk and return, investment with more risk will result to more return. Thus, firms with high liquidity of working capital may have low risk than low profitability. The issue here is in managing working capital, firm must take into consideration all the items in both accounts and to balance the risk and return (Lee & Kang, 2008).Liquidity will help a firm to avoid a situation where a firm will be forced to liquidate with its attendant problems of selling assets at distressed prices and the extra fees paid to lawyers, trustees in bankruptcy and liquidators on liquidation.

2.2 Theoretical Framework

A number of different theories of socioeconomic accounting were borrowed to form sound foundation to substantiate Treasury Single Account adoption and implementation. Examples are:

Stakeholder Theory: It assumed that adoption of Treasury Single Account by the federal government is as a result of the pressure from stakeholders/citizens majorly against corruption. It suggested that the government will responds to the concerns and expectations of powerful stakeholders/citizens and some of the responses will be in the form of strategic opinions. Stakeholders’ theory provides rich insights into the factors that motivate government in relation to the adoption and implementation of Treasury Single Account.

Public Finance Management Theory: This theory assumed that all aspects of financial resources, mobilization and expenditure should be well managed in government for the benefits of the citizenry. It includes resources mobilization, prioritization of programmes, the budgetary process, efficient management of resources and exercising control to guide against threats. Treasury Single Account (TSA) primarily is to avoid misapplication of public funds

Modern Money Theory (MMT): It a theory that theorized how monetarily sovereign governments operate and their impacts on the economy. It shows that it is relevant to aggregate the central bank and the treasury into a government sector that finances itself through monetary creation such that financial position of the treasury and the central bank are so intertwined that both of them are constantly in contact in order to make fiscal and monetary policy run smoothly. For the purpose of this study we used the Public Finance Management Theory. Accordingly, many theories have been developed over the years concerning bank liquidity. They are liquid asset theory, the shiftability theory, the anticipate income and liability management theory (Nwankwo, 2004), Fry, Goodhart and Ameida, (1996).

  1. Liquidity assets theory: it argues that banks must hold large amount of liquid assets as reserves against possible demands for payment, the original intent being prudent cushion in the face of uncertainty. The theory is defective in at least two important respects. There is, first the problem of determining accurately the quantity of notes that might be presented at any one time. The theory is also, grossly deficient in a world of active money markets and purchased funding where the flow of funds can shift with considerable speed and banks are increasingly dependent on the market.

  2. Commercial bills or loans theory: it states that bank funds should principally be invested in short term self liquidating loans for working capital purposes confined to financing the movement of goods through the successive stages of the production circle-production, transportation, storage distribution and consumption

  3. Shift ability theory: according to this theory, the liquidity of a bank is sustained if it holds assets that could be shifted or sold to either the lender or the investors for cash. The implication of this will be manifested in the type of collateral that would be acceptable to banks against possible loan default. In essence, such collateral must be marketable and should be converted into cash without delay if when necessary. Hence, this theory subjugates loan decision to the overriding goals of ensuring adequate liquidity of the bank. In contrast to the commercial loan doctrine which emphasized maturity, the degree of shiftability or marketability of loans and investments provided the liquidity base for bank operations under the shiftability doctrine (Ariyo,2005:35).

3. Methodology

The study looks at the impact of treasury single account on the liquidity of banks in Nigeria. The study employed time series data for this work. The population of the study is made up of all commercial banks in Nigeria. 15(fifteen) commercial banks were selected as sample for the study because they are quoted on The Nigerian Stock Exchange. Secondary data was collected for the purpose of this study (Banks Annual Reports). The data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired sample t- tests. Since TSA is a recent phenomenon in the country, the research seeks to know the effect of its adoption on the liquidity of commercial banks since its introduction and full implementation in 2015. For this study, Current ratio has been adopted to measure liquidity. Furthermore, Profit after tax was captured using the banks exact profit after tax.

4. Data Analysis and Presentation

Paired Samples Test

Table 2. Descriptive Statistics

Mean

N

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Pair 1

CR

1.1493

15

.06541

.01689

CRDURING

1.004

15

.40885

.10556

 

Paired Differences

T

Df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Mean

Std. Deviati on

Std. Error Mean

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Pair 1

CR –CRDURING

.14533

.42093

.10868

-.08777

.37844

1.337

14

.202

A paired-samples t-test was conducted to evaluate the impact of Treasury Single Account on the liquidity of banks. There was a statistically significant decrease (M =1.1493, SD = 0.06541) to Time 2 (M = 1.0040, SD =0.40885), t (14) = 1.337, p <. 0005 (two-tailed). The mean decrease in Current ratio was 0.1453 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from -.08777 to .37844.

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics

Mean

N

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Pair 1

CR

1.1493

15

.06541

.01689

CRAFTER

.8327

15

.52437

.13539

 

Paired Differences

T

Df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Mean

Std. Deviati on

Std. Error Mean

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Pair 1

CR –CRAFTER

.31667

.51595

.13322

.03094

.60239

2.377

14

.032

A paired-samples t-test was conducted to evaluate the impact of Treasury Single Account on the liquidity of banks. There was a statistically significant decrease in Current ratio after TSA Adoption (M =1.1493, SD = 0.06541) to Time 2 (M = .8327, SD =.524437), t (14) = 2.377, p <. 0005 (two-tailed). The mean decrease in Current ratio 0.3166 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from .3094-.60239.

Table 4. Descriptive Statistics showing the result of Quick ratio during the year of TSA Adoption

Mean

N

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Pair 1

QR

.9693

15

.10840

.02799

RCENTQRDURING

3.0787

15

7.54265

1.94750

 

Paired Differences

T

Df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Mean

Std. Deviati on

Std. Error Mean

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Pair 1

QR –RCENTQRDURING

-2.10933

7.56065

1.95215

-6.29628

2.07762

-1.081

14

.298

A paired-samples t-test was conducted to evaluate the impact of Treasury Single Account on the liquidity of banks. There was a statistically significant decrease in quick ratio (M =.9693, SD =.10840) to Time 2 (M = 3.0787, SD =7.54265), t (14) = -1.081, p <. 0005 (two-tailed). The mean decrease in quick ratio of -2.1094 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from -6.29628 to 2.07762.

Table 5. Result of Quick ratio after Treasury Single Account Adoption using Paired Samples test during TSA Adoption

Mean

N

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Pair 1

QR

.9693

15

.10840

.02799

QRAFTER

.7133

15

.54206

.13996

 

Paired Differences

T

Df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Mean

Std. Deviati on

Std. Error Mean

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Pair 1

QR –QRAFTER

.25600

.52507

.13557

-.03477

.54677

1.888

14

.080

A paired-samples t-test was conducted to evaluate the impact of Treasury Single Account on the liquidity of banks. There was a statistically significant decrease in quick ratio after TSA Adoption (M =.9693, SD = .10840) to Time 2 (M = .7133, SD =.54206 ), t (14) = 1.888, p <. 0005 (two-tailed). The mean decrease in quick ratio of 0.256 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from -0.3477 to .54677.

Table 6. Result of Profit after Tax during the year of TSA

Mean

N

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Pair 1

PAT

38009801

153.8462

13

3446831738

5.53025

95597912

08.65355

11717483

277.7579

1

PATDURING

27713871

461.5385

13

4224798677

7.34801

 

Paired Differences

T

Df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Mean

Std. Deviati on

Std. Error Mean

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Pair 1

PAT –PATDURING

10295

92969

2.3076

9

2528762

5972.542

57

70135

25544.

51978

-

49852

29745.

29082

25577

08912

9.9062

1

1.468

12

.168

There is a significant difference of 0.168 which is greater than .0005 in Profit after tax during the period of adoption of Treasury Single Account (TSA). Furthermore, the banks made profit after tax during the implementation of Treasury Single Account).

Table 7. Result of PAT after TSA Adoption

Paired Differences

t

Df

Sig. (2- tailed)

Mean

Std. Deviatio n

Std. Error Mean

95%

Confidence Interval of the Difference

Mean

Std. Deviat ion

Std. Error Mean

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

Pair 1

PAT – PATAFER

28087

38880

0.000

00

3064810

3738.36

217

79133

06358

.1009

3

11115

03466

5.729

91

45059

74293

4.270

10

3.549

14

.003

There is a significant difference of .003 which is greater than .0005 in Profit after tax after the period of adoption of Treasury Single Account (TSA). Furthermore, the banks made profit after tax during the implementation of Treasury Single Account).

5. Conclusion

The policy will greatly improve the management of government revenue. If it is implemented, it will pave way for the timely payment and capturing of all revenues going into the government treasury, without the intermediation of multiple banking arrangements. Besides, the system will likely reduce the mismanagement of public funds by revenue-generating agencies. It is also expected to help check excess liquidity, inflation, high interest rates, round-tripping of government deposits, and the sliding value of the naira.

In view of these benefits, we call for strict compliance with the directive on TSA by the relevant government organizations. The implementation of the order will, however, require the cooperation of the National Assembly with the Executive arm to ensure strict compliance by the MDAs. The fears that have been raised about the implications of the new measure are hardly necessary.

Recommendations

The implementation of the order will however require the cooperation of the National Assembly with the Executive arm to ensure strict compliance by the MDAs to make enforcement possible. Again, The MDAs, in collaboration with the Executive, will also need to be diligent in drawing up their budgets and presenting them for onsideration and passage by the legislature. The financial regulators, including the CBN, should also be proactive and institute measures to correct any lapses or negative impact of the policy, as no law or measure is foolproof. The fear that it will negatively affect commercial banks, and possibly lead to massive job losses, should be addressed.

References
Ariyo, A. (2005). Liquidity Management in Nigeria, Lagos, West African book publishers
Bhunia, A. (2010). A trend analysis of liquidity management efficiency in selected private sector industry, Indian steel; International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management, 1(5); 9-21
CBN (2015) Revised Guidelines for compliance with Treasury Single Account by Banks in Nigeria Central Bank of Nigeria (2014), “Communiqué No. 94 of the Monetary Policy Committee Meeting,”
Eme, O. I., Chukwurah, D.C., & Emmanuel, N.I., (2015). An Analysis Of Pros And Cons Treasury Single Account Policy In Nigeria Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (OMAN Chapter) 5(4)
Eljelly, A. (2004). Liquidity-Profitability Tradeoff: An Empirical Investigation in an Emerging Market. International Journal of Commerce & Management. 14(2), pp. 48-61.
Guardian Editorial,(2015). Buhari on Treasury Single Account, Guardian, retrieved on August 28, P16.
Gwarzo. M. (2016)., TSA: Weep Not SEC. Thisdaylive http://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2016/03/09/tsa-weep-not-sec/ retrieved March, 2016
IMF (2010). Treasury Single Account: Concept, Design and Implementation Issues. Working paper prepared by Sailendra Pattanayak and Israel Fainboim, Authorized for distribution by Marco Cangiano and Michel Lazare
Iroegbu,C (2015),”Treasury Single Account ‘ll block leakages’, Vanguard, August 24, P38
Kanu. C. (2016), Impact of Treasury Single Account on the Liquidity .ABC Journal of Advanced Research, 5(1) 43-52.
Lienert(2009). Modernizing Cash Management, Technical Notes and Manuals, Fiscal Affairs Department (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Mathias Okwe, Abuja. Chijioke Nelson, Temiloluwa Adeoye, David Ogah(2015), Treasury Single Account: Giving Life to Jonathan’s ‘Dead’ Policy Directives’, Sunday Guardian, retrieved August 16,Pp52-58
Muhakanizi (2014). Strengthening Public Financial Management and Accountability Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development
Nwankwo, G. (2004). Bank Management Principles and Practice, Lagos. Malt House PressLimited
Obinna, C.(2015), Banks Face Liquidity Strain as FG Fully Enforces Treasury Single Account,
Olagunju, A. Adeyanju, O. & Olabode, O. (2011). Liquidity Management and Commercial Bank’s Profitability in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting. Vol. 2, No. 7/8.
Raheman, A. & Nasir, M. (2007). Working Capital Management and Profitability – Case of Pakistani Firm. International Review of Business Research Papers, 3(1), 279-300
Vanguard Editorial (2015), Treasury Single Account: Bank deposits loss may hit N2trn, August 17,P 18

Cite this:
APA Style
IEEE Style
BibTex Style
MLA Style
Chicago Style
GB-T-7714-2015
Ajetunmobi, O. O., Adesina, K., Faboyede, S. O., & Adejana, B. P. (2017). The Impact of Treasury Single Account on the Liquidity of Banks in Nigeria. J. Account. Fin. Audit. Stud., 3(3), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas030307
O. O. Ajetunmobi, K. Adesina, S. O. Faboyede, and B. P. Adejana, "The Impact of Treasury Single Account on the Liquidity of Banks in Nigeria," J. Account. Fin. Audit. Stud., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 132-143, 2017. https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas030307
@research-article{Ajetunmobi2017TheIO,
title={The Impact of Treasury Single Account on the Liquidity of Banks in Nigeria},
author={Opeyemi O. Ajetunmobi and Kehinde Adesina and Samuel O. Faboyede and B. Peter Adejana},
journal={Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies},
year={2017},
page={132-143},
doi={https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas030307}
}
Opeyemi O. Ajetunmobi, et al. "The Impact of Treasury Single Account on the Liquidity of Banks in Nigeria." Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, v 3, pp 132-143. doi: https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas030307
Opeyemi O. Ajetunmobi, Kehinde Adesina, Samuel O. Faboyede and B. Peter Adejana. "The Impact of Treasury Single Account on the Liquidity of Banks in Nigeria." Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 3, (2017): 132-143. doi: https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas030307
Ajetunmobi O. O., Adesina K., Faboyede S. O., et al. The Impact of Treasury Single Account on the Liquidity of Banks in Nigeria[J]. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 2017, 3(3): 132-143. https://doi.org/10.56578/jafas030307